Status quo bias and what to do about it

I had a really interesting lunch with a friend yesterday… He’s a worldly guy – extremely well-read, brilliant political thinker, great understanding of economics.

He’s always fascinating to break bread with because he can bounce around so authoritatively on so many different subjects — the slow-motion implosion of the EU, China’s massive construction bubble, the global debt de-leveraging.

Ironically, we were sitting in a restaurant right across the street from the park in Washington DC where the Occupy protestors have encamped for the winter. Every square inch of the park was covered with blue tents giving off the feel of a squalorous UN refugee camp in some war-torn third world hellhole.

Looking out at the park I told him that as ambivalent as I was about the Occupy movement (I agree with much of their sentiment, but part ways with some of their nuttier solutions which see even more government as the answer) my sense was that this was the Occupy movement in hibernation – settling in for a long cold winter — but by the Cherry Blossom’s first bloom the movement will stir from its slumber and be more energized than ever.

In fact, I’ll make a prediction here as an aside that by the time the political conventions roll around later this summer, the level of our national dissatisfaction may make the violent 1968 Democratic convention look like a 1920’s Women’s Temperance Union march by comparison.

My friend summed it all up by looking out at the Occupy folks across the street, saying, “Here’s the bottom line… We’re all f***ed. Even they know it.”  If that’s the case, I asked him, what was he doing to prepare.  To my surprise his answer was “nothing.”

Nothing? If there was one guy I would have thought had been taking steps to prepare for a future reality that will be wildly different than today, it would have been him.

All of which leads me, in my typically long-winded fashion, to two insights:

Understanding doesn’t equal action.  Sure many of us are blissfully unaware of the magnitude of the challenges we face.

Seduced by the modern day equivalent of Roman bread and circuses, we sit enraptured dribbling over the latest exploits of Jersey Shore’s Snooki, or take at face value the vapid infotainment spoon fed to us by Stepford-news readers on Fox, MSNBC and CNN, utterly oblivious to the tsunami gathering on the horizon.

But there are others of us who “get it” and still do nothing. Why? I can only speculate, but I believe it’s because they are too invested in the status quo. In other words, they have status quo bias.

Look, the status quo is a powerful thing. People tend not to change established behaviors or beliefs unless the incentives to change are compelling. Acknowledging that the status quo (everything we’ve lived, believed, and prepared for) is no longer operative is tough. It means starting from scratch… It’s going back to square one and facing up to the fact that a vastly different future awaits us. It’s simply naive to think that this doesn’t have a huge impact on the psyche that results in head-in-the-sand paralysis for many of us.

So, what to do… As I explained to my friend, start with baby steps. Yes, it’s a pain in the ass to do the big things – hedging your sovereign risk by opening a foreign bank account or buying foreign real estate for instance – so don’t start there. Begin with little things: Start a small vegetable garden in the backyard; Buy a few gold coins now and again; stockpile some food; learn a new marketable skill that will be valuable in your local community.

Baby steps. Do this and you will gradually ease yourself into the bigger things later as you gather momentum.

Which gets me to the second insight…

We’re not f***ed

Things will be wildly different in our lifetimes and we will face huge challenges, yes, but humanity has been through this many times before and always managed to come out the other side.  Think about the cataclysmic changes of the industrial revolution – which by the way was rife with just as many apocalyptic prognosticators as we see today.

James Howard Kunstler had a great piece yesterday about James Dines, whose work over the years has focused on collective cognitive psychology. Dines suggests that what we are witnessing today is a “murmuration” – an unexplained set of behaviors among living species that respond to things at the exact same time, similar to the way a flock of starlings all turn in the sky at the exact same instant without any communication between them. Think of the almost simultaneous uprisings in Tunisia, Egypt, Europe, the U.S. and many other countries in just one year – 2011, and you’ll get an idea about how murmurations work with the opposable thumb crowd.

Humanity’s murmuration today is an acknowledgment that the status quo is no longer operative. It’s a recognition that’s occurring globally and simultaneously across nation-states, cultures, societies and borders. The changeover will be every bit as calamitous as the changeover from an agrarian to an industrial society but it’s not the end of the world.

In our case, I believe humanity is recognizing that the era of centralization is coming to an end. The Internet and communications are largely responsible for the wave of decentralization sweeping the globe, giving us a collective recognition that we no longer have to rely on fraudulent centralized institutions for our care and well-being. In essence, we have suddenly awoken to the realization that we are all on the downward slope of the centralization marginal utility curve.

Why is this a good thing? Because the massive centralization of the later industrial age placed less and less of a premium on individuals taking any responsibility for our own actions and decisions. At least in the developed world, we came to rely on big government to feed clothe and protect us, big corporations to employ us until retirement, an industrialized food system to put food on our table, and a massive health care bureaucracy to keep us healthy.

Those days are rapidly waning. The wave of decentralization sweeping the globe will force us to get back to the core values of resilience and self-reliance… Our lives will likely be simpler with less focus on the acquisition of things, more community oriented and more entrepreneurially driven. Exponential economic growth is out for certain, and resource constraints will require us to be more creative in doing more with less. Inevitably (and paradoxically) however, this will once again unleash a new wave of human ingenuity and creativity that will rise to the the challenge.

It’s a fascinating time in world history, but to fully reap the benefits we must start turning our back on a status quo that’s like an old doddering has-been that keeps trying to recapture the glory days and start seriously preparing for a much different future.

With that, I’ll leave you with some murmuring starlings…

  • Courtney

    Thanks for the starlings, Coley. With enough perspective, there is always order to the chaos.

  • Seahorsey

    Hi Coley, nice article. You said that some of occupy’s solutions is big government . I have been following the occupy movement since the onset and while I have heard naive individuals who had been interviewed mention something like this (their opinion only, along with others with entirely different opinions, like Ron Paul supporters), I have never heard or read anything about big government being the answer coming from a consensus of the movement proper ( http://ampedstatus.org/ http://owsnews.org/ http://www.adbusters.org/). To my understanding the movement is open source, leaderless and based upon anarchist principals, also they have not released any specific demands or solutions officially (apart from the chants on the street about ending wall st crime), so as to not alienate anyone who may have a beef with the system. I have also been following anonymous on several of their dedicated blogs etc., including dialogue on twitter, and have not heard of anybody active in the movement mention a possible solution “more government as the answer”. Could you please reference where you picked up this info, so I could check it out? I know that because of the nature of this movement, things are very fragmented and it is easy for me to miss stuff.

    Cheers 

    Scott

    http://uncletedsfarm.blogspot.com/

    • http://www.theresilientfamily.com/ The Resilient Family

      Scott, 
      I’m not very current on all the Occupy activities, but I just heard an occupy protester on NPR say that he is protesting “money in politics” and he went on to say that he is going to keep protesting until he gets a job.  He said he was working for the government but currently he had NO job.  The implication was that we wanted the government to give him a job, all the while he is protesting money in politics.  Is it just me or is that crazy talk!   Should the government hire everyone?  I’m sure (or at least I hope) he is on the fringe of the movement, and I admire the open source nature of the movement. I think it is in line with the decentralization we have been discussing on this website.Trey

      • Anonymous

        rf,
        might want to consider the source, agenda and controlling interests of npr.

    • http://www.theresilientfamily.com/ The Resilient Family

      Hey Scott… You raise a great point. The Occupy movement itself has been very understated about its demands and it’s quite possible that folks with a “more government” agenda are seeking to hijack the movement for their own ends while the movement itself is more anarchist.

      That to me is a big potential bugaboo. Take the money in politics issue as Trey outlines below. Yes, we probably should get money out of politics… But does that include labor unions? Does it include government unions like AFSCME? Does it include foundations (like the foundations globalists like George Soros support) that spend hundreds of millions of dollars to influence public policy? Does it include any and every “public interest” group lobbying for more government funding to support their pet cause?

      Typically what I’m seeing is that those attaching themselves to Occupy Wall Street are looking for competitive advantage — get money out of politics if it’s “business interests”, but if it’s interests centered around the “public good” (as defined by those who benefit at the expense of my loss) those hangers on are silent.

      More on this tomorrow because I think you’ve raised a really important discussion point…
      Cheers

      • Anonymous

        rf,
        did your losses to the public good get covered yet?
        by the likes of
        roads
        rails
        aircraft
        construction and zoning law
        schools (yes even the meager resultant schools of this system compared to what came before public schools)
        police
        fire departments
        banks (state owned banks before the corrupt central banking system of today)
        adam smith was no socialist nor fool when he wrote of protecting the commons with examples of common pastures overgrazed by one greedy shepherd at the expense of all his neighbors

    • Anonymous

      seahorsey,
      word
      even as soros and others inject money and try to control the swarm that is occupy kinda cool that they might not be able to pull it off
      so far occupy has proven genius wise aggressively and intently decentralized
      raises the concern though that the history directors will not waste time trying to weed out a few leaders to crush this and future resistance
      instead they may mow the entire lawn
      or plow up the entire pasture to pull out the grassroots
      either way, got to wonder if gates zuckerberg rockerfeller and friends will give up an inch of centralized power
      let alone the huge power and wealth needed for profound required changes

  • Anonymous

    coley,
    were the arab uprisings uncoordinated murmurations?  
    perhaps in the context written here 
    if the food price hikes and shortages were uncoordinated

    kunstler might be on record about the coming change
    moves from complex to simple systems made involuntarily (and they almost always are) are necessarily more violent and traumatic than the reverse
    downsides of exponential curves are always tougher

    comments on resilience and self reliance sound off key
    when heard next to the sound of those who suffer worst in collapse (not just change) the poor get hit the hardest
    ironic that they are always necessarily the most self reliant

    this borders on ayn rand  sounding stuff setting up to blame the victims of corporate and government colonialism and assymetric warfare (and did she not die using up medicare and social security benefits under another name?)

    to be sure the reduction in centralized power is welcome
    agreed that regulation has only ever been used to crush local and small players by larger and more centralized powers

    a couple caveats to this welcome transition

    first, 
    we first worlders have advantages in terms of knowledge and physical resources
    what we lack is that resilience that can only be gleaned from years of experience with a more ghetto life (crime, seriously dangerous hygiene reductions, new old diseases resurging, much more directly predatory corrupt governments,…)
    while we have looked at such issues, personal perspective is relatively lacking
    less wealthy local friends have so far graced us with the time to school us in such trials
    while embarrassed by our ineptitude in such practical matters we are proud to have such capable and caring teachers
    progressively more humbled as they take the time even as their time is more pressed

    cool vid on starlings
    kinda fractal in what we saw in the blog entry
    such aspects of life are beautiful and impressive from a distance
    doubt the raptors those birds swarmed felt the same
    curious too about what feeds that large a bio form

    interesting to note old journals of explorers 200 years ago too
    even those swarms are decimated fragments of the biota present back then.

  • Pingback: The Resilient Family » Panama pros and cons

  • Robwilson

    Like this a lot. Can’t wait till the USA breaks up into separate smaller countries. Now THAT will be good, very very good

  • Pingback: The Pros and Cons of Panama | Inside Panama Blog

Filed in: Head Stuff

You might like:

Quiz time Quiz time
Anti-Brainwashing Techniques Anti-Brainwashing Techniques
Rooftop farming in Queens… A glimpse of the future? Rooftop farming in Queens… A glimpse of the future?
There’s plenty you know…. There’s plenty you know….
© 2012 The Resilient Family. All rights reserved. XHTML / CSS Valid.
Proudly designed by Pied Pixel.